1 | DALE ALDRINN PRADEL | UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS | 93.00 |
2 | JADE CHRISTYN TORRES LEONOR | UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN | 92.60 |
3 | ARIS BLAZO NISOLA | BICOL UNIVERSITY-LEGAZPI | 92.40 |
4 | EARSHAD BARROGA BANJAL | UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN PHILIPPINES-DAVAO CITY | 92.20 |
5 | REY ANGELO VARQUEZ PADRIQUE | CEBU NORMAL UNIVERSITY (CEBU STATE COLLEGE) | 92.00 |
JOHN CARLO CATAMORA PAREÑAS | UNIVERSIDAD DE MANILA (CITY COLL. OF MANILA) | 92.00 | |
6 | SENEN NIÑO TANTOCO PINEDA II | UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN | 91.80 |
7 | MILDRED SUMBAD BOLINGET | SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY | 91.60 |
8 | PATRICIA GERALDINE DIVINO FAROCHILEN | UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN | 91.40 |
JEFFREY ROY ADLAWAN LOPEZ | DAVAO DOCTORS COLLEGE, INC. | 91.40 | |
ADAIAH CABABARO PRESTO | PALAWAN STATE UNIVERSITY-P. PRINCESA | 91.40 | |
9 | APRIL JOY DIANE GARING GALICIA | WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY-PHILIPPINES-CABANATUAN CITY | 91.20 |
MARK PHILIP MARFIL RAGOS | UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS | 91.20 | |
10 | EDMUNDO POTESTADES ABAD JR | UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN | 91.00 |
JOSE MARI MALLARI CALAMLAM | PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY-MANILA | 91.00 | |
ANNE THERESA BAUTISTA GABA | UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN | 91.00 |
Sunday, November 24, 2013
PRC Releases September 2013 LET Secondary Passers/Results
Friday, November 22, 2013
Almost Perfect Educational Assessments...Then What?
DOES a well-designed traditional assessment method that measures students' learning fairly and consistently MATTER if the school, students and teachers lack the necessary learning and teaching materials and conducive learning environment like most of the Philippines schools are experiencing now? In other words, can good assessment practice enhance learning if we do not have the resources to acquire good learning?
The question elicited some interest from some of my classmates and here below are their responses:
--o0o--
by Maggi Mae "Magz" Santos - Monday, 18 November 2013, 08:25 AM
Hey there Pons!
It is indeed and is going to be a challenge. Despite good intentions of well-crafted assessment and good assessment practices, these intentions may not be met due to lack of resources.
But then, this is where resourcefulness and industriousness come in. Like what we say in Filipino, "kung gusto, maraming paraan." If we really want our students to learn, we will try our best to give them the what they deserve. Hmm... MacGyver moves I guess... Hehehe.
--o0o--
by Reynaldo Jr. (Rhed) Flores - Monday, 18 November 2013, 09:00 AM
Hi Pons!
I believe the quality of assessment tools MATTER at ALL TIMES regardless of how equipped or not the classrooms are. Admittedly, most schools here in the Philippines do experience lack of learning materials- books, supplemental workbooks and manuals, computer and speech laboratory, etc.
However, would it be prudent if we capitalize on what we currently have to maximize learning processes? Most especially that assessment methods largely depend on the skills of the educators in preparing and carefully implementing them and not necessarily on the type of materials to be used, effectiveness can still be ensured.
Considering that many private schools out there can afford advanced learning materials, does it mean that they would always be better than public schools? Hmmm… Not really, as assessment skill isn’t commercially sold: it is something to be gained and mastered. Me think. :D
--o0o--
by Rommel Daz - Monday, 18 November 2013, 12:32 PM
Hi PONS,
If you would look closely, resources has very little impact on crafting assessment, this is because we assess our student base on what we have supposedly "taught', am I right? However, resources have big impact in DELIVERY and CRAFTING of curriculum.
It is really a challenge teaching Computer Science without actual computers or teaching Chemistry without laboratory equipment. As we know, each learner is unique. We all have learning styles, some are visual learners, other maybe actual and few might be bookish or something else. I suppose covering range of learners, good resources are needed required - In short students with resources experience better learning.
--o0o--
With the above comments, future teachers and instructors are still optimistic and hopeful that in spite of limited resources plaguing the Philippines educational arena, they could teach curriculum contents to affected students in the best of their abilities. Good assessment methods can be means to improve students' understanding and skills and future educators are ready to revise and devise instructional methods and strategies to face the challenge.
With the enthusiasm of my classmates, I think I am also ready to fill the gap of scarce learning materials with innovative learning tools and styles to ensure that what we ought to teach are learned and measured fairly and appropriately using either traditional or alternative method and/or combination of both. However, the challenge is exacerbated with the destruction of schools, learning materials and equipment in Leyte, Samar, Cebu, Panay and other Western and Central Visayan provinces. With this scenario, future teachers need to be more patient, inventive and novel to address this reality in line with their mission to educate, diagnose, correct, enhance and assess students' learning. At this point in time, it is appropriate to acknowledge and congratulate every teacher for his/her importance and sacrifices by saying ---
for a job well done and will be done!
To read the original comments, please click:
http://myportal.upou.edu.ph/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=75463
--o0o--
Images from:
1) http://www.asiaamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/j3.jpg
2) http://mype.co.za/new/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/destroyed_textbooks.jpg
3) http://www.newfilipinoprivateschool.com/photos/facilities/SCIENCELAB/P4271275.JPG
4) http://www.science.ph/images/data/nh7i.jpg
5)http://imageshack.us/a/img546/8099/o1h0.jpg
6) http://static.rappler.com/images/thankyouteachers-rappler-20130831.png
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Traditionally Authentic
Alternative assessment is not a replacement of traditional methods simply because not all learning outcomes can be gauged effectively and efficiently with it. The challenge for the instructors is to balance the two in accordance with the contents of the curriculum and the learning goals.
Traditionally, students are generally given with objective type test items such as true-false, multiple choice, matching type and fill-in-the blanks. Occasionally, a short answer or an extended response essay type is also provided to measure what they have learned. However, this students’ evaluation is mostly given just to give a mark or grade to learners at the end of the grading period or at the end of the school year. No feedback has been provided genuinely to students and parents. This is seen as one of the reasons why many students lack the skills and knowledge needed in college life or in real life. Although they did not fully understand the concepts as manifested by their poor performance in the tests, teachers had to let them aside because they need to teach all the topics that are included in the curriculum for the annual achievement test within the scheduled time frame. As a result, many students entered the next grade level with limited understanding that resulted to poor performance.
Authentic or performance-based assessment or the so-called alternative methods of assessment have been introduced to measure students’ learning in a variety of ways relevant to their local and real life situations. Students are then exposed to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding through individual or group presentations or performances, process or product creation and other artistic endeavor such as writing, painting or poster making. Portfolios, journals, diaries are other authentic assessment methods that are added to traditional written tests.
Proponents of alternative assessments argue that the authentic approach is a better method of evaluating learners as compared to traditional measurement. Of course, this is a debatable issue since from the beginning up to the present, alternative methods do not fully replace the traditional one. In fact, most government and professional bodies are still adhering to the traditional methods of accrediting and licensing professionals and government personnel through multiple choice test items. Multiple choice test items are also widely used in college entrance and scholarship examinations and even in employment and other diagnostic activities.
Although authentic assessments can manifest direct evidence of students’ performance, measuring learners’ process and product is time consuming especially if students are involved in the production of checklist, rating scale and rubric as standards for good performance. In the same manner, traditional methods of testing can also measure higher order thinking skills if test items are designed in such a way that correct answers are not prone to guessing but as a product of in depth comprehension and analysis. Of course, creating very analytical and comprehensive test items is demanding and challenging.
Both traditional and authentic assessment can effectively and efficiently measure students’ knowledge, performance or skill depending on what specific learning outcomes and curriculum contents are to be measured. Time, cost and standards of performance should also be considered in selecting the better method in a particular situation. Whether traditional or authentic, the bottom line is whether students learned what they should learn or not. Select the one that is appropriate and practical in a given situation.
Images from
1) http://web.mst.edu/~rhall/ed_psych/assessment.gif
2) http://static.toondoo.com/public/w/h/a/whatedsaid/toons/cool-cartoon-1727740.png
3) http://onhandschools.com/Portals/166710/images/Test%20Taking%20Cartoon.jpg
4) http://www.uft.org/files/photo/cartoon5_2_13.jpg
References
Kwako, J. A BRIEF SUMMARY OF TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM. Retrieved from www.stat.wisc.edu/~nordheim/Kwako_assessment4.doc
Mueller, J. Authentic Assessment Toolbox. Retrieved from http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm
Monday, November 11, 2013
A Classroom without a Test
Almost everyone who has the chance and the means to attend school loves to do so. However, the enthusiasm wanes when it is time for testing. It seems that every student is keen to gain some kind of learning or understanding but when the teachers are about to measure their level of knowledge and skills, they become anxious and stress about it.
Because test is part of student life and his/her future depends on passing it in whatever type it is presented to him/her, some students develop a sense of abhorrence to it. The pressure from parents and teachers makes learning miserable to some. Instead of the initial happy outlook about education and its importance, students begin to develop a fear to take a test. This results to some kind of cheating on the part of the student. The poem below written by Kenn Nesbitt showcases some of the tactics develop by learners:
This Morning is Our History Test
A Funny School Poem for Kids
This morning is our history test.
I've pinned my notes inside my vest.
Inside my coat I wrote my notes,
including dates and famous quotes.
I've written more upon my hand
that only I can understand,
and in my socks and sleeves I stowed
my scribbled notes in secret code.
I've written down so many names
of winners of Olympic games,
of buildings, people, places too,
from Tennessee to Timbuktu.
I even copied down a piece
on ancient Rome and ancient Greece,
plus everything from Shakespeare's plays
to who invented mayonnaise.
I came to school so well prepared.
I wasn't nervous, wasn't scared.
But here it is, the history test.
I look inside my coat and vest
to get the dates and famous quotes
and find I cannot read my notes.
So much for Shakespeare, Greece and Rome.
I left my glasses back at home.
As a student, I can understand why some students practice this kind of dishonesty. I can say that learner like me does not really hate tests. What we detest are tests that are designed badly and do not fairly measure our knowledge and skills, especially when they are given only as a requirement to grade us.
I dislike test when it was unannounced. For me, it is absolutely unfair. I know that teachers hate it too when the principal, district supervisor or superintendent suddenly comes to evaluate their classes. I hate test items that are not highlighted as important or even discussed in class. I abhor exams that are not given back or return without a single remark. I despise test items that are forgotten and never been reviewed even if most of the class did not get the correct answers. I hate test items that measure irrelevant and meaningless knowledge that can easily be forgotten such as names, dates, places and events, like Kenn’s history test. I dislike test when it is given only once at the end of the course and it is the only basis of your grade.
Some students hate tests because they do not study their lessons. They despise exams because they do not understand the contents. The abhor assessments because their parents will scold them when they performed badly.
Because of this natural dislike of tests of most students, can we design a classroom without a test?
As future instructor, I can say that it is possible to teach students, provide them opportunities for learning and assess them without a formal test such as the dreaded written exam. To measure their level of performance and skill, learners can be assessed using authentic or performance-based assessment method. Assessment tools in this approach include portfolio, presentation, products and other processes that constitute real world and local scenarios and benefits. However, to be of value and elicit positive response among students, learning outcomes, instructional strategies and assessment should be in accord with one another. For example, performance of knowledge or skill that is not taken in class or taught should not be assessed. Likewise, assessment methods used can gauge learning outcomes or objectives.
Since alternative methods of assessment can be time consuming at times, traditional approach minus written test can still be used as genuine determinant of student learning. One such method is class discussion or recitation. Initially, this approach should be used as formative. Towards the end, the class should be advised of the date and time that their answers and/or opinion might be graded. In this case, the students shall prepare for the appointed time.
Another approach to be used is class game, like that of trivial pursuit, where students can participate and answer a particular question regarding the material. So that every student can have the chance to answer, regain confidence and correct a mistake, it should be done frequently throughout the course. Although written, assignments, journals, actual experiments, scientific investigations and essays are less frightening than classroom exams. To be effective, the goals and the methods of assessment should be explicitly determined and discussed prior to any meaningful activity. Frequent feedback should be given throughout the process. For those who cannot show their understanding in written reports, presentations, performances or any artistic creations can be regarded as substitutes. Likewise, these proofs of learning should tackle the learning outcomes as well as the minimum standard required for such authentic activities.
Tests can be intimidating if they do not measure what they purport to measure and no discussion is given about their contents and objectives. Tests can be replaced by performance and skills manifestations as long as they showcase the relevant materials included in the learning objectives and they can be measured fairly and objectively. As long as students learn what we expected them to learn, the assessment method used to gauge their level of understanding and skills is irrelevant. Doing away with the written test is one way as long as the alternative method/s prescribed can successfully measure fairly and objectively their learning.
Come attend my classroom without a test!
Images from
1) http://campusninjas.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/exam-cartoon.jpg
2) http://www.poetry4kids.com/poem-339.html#.Un_KXnByC-k
3) http://www.insidecolby.com/blogs/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ExamCartoon.jpg
4) http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/rma/lowres/rman195l.jpg
5) https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLOzA7FvoGCeFQtZyjTsoxMis0u5wHsVda8jTxMKFZjCXYLPBMMKZsJKtl92CowjYHPI985dD_UzRQGs7RLZRy8wxAOZZ9GbEIJbYPRUMKEvisx-RQ-prr6PUxLmrMWlik6m3aJf_c2Dhm/s400/MathClass.jpg
6) http://www.justajourney.co.uk/images/layout/rightHand_teachers_home.jpg
References
Erlandson, C. Performance Assessments: A Wealth of Possibilities. Developed by Saskatchewan Professional Development Unit. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=38b5005b-31ca-4a37-bc4d-b6d03edc46d4
Nesbitt, k. (2005). This Morning is Our History Test. http://www.poetry4kids.com/poem-339.html#.Un-n23ByC-l
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Some Issues with Norm-referenced Tests
"Here are some of the issues with norm-referenced tests:
Tests can be biased. Some questions may favor one kind of student or another for reasons that have nothing to do with the subject area being tested. Non-school knowledge that is more commonly learned by middle or upper class children is often included in tests. To help make the bell curve, test makers usually eliminate questions that students with low overall scores might get right but those with high overall scores get wrong. Thus, most questions which favor minority groups are eliminated.
NRTs usually have to be completed in a time limit. Some students do not finish, even if they know the material. This can be particularly unfair to students whose first language is not English or who have learning disabilities. This "speededness" is one way test makers sort people out.
The items on the test are only a sample of the whole subject area. There are often thousands of questions that could be asked, but tests may have just a few dozen questions. A test score is therefore an estimate of how well the student would do if she could be asked all the possible questions.
All tests have "measurement error." No test is perfectly reliable. A score that appears as an absolute number -- say, Jamal's 63 -- really is an estimate. For example, Jamal's "true score" is probably between 56 and 70, but it could be even further off. Sometimes results are reported in "score bands," which show the range within which a test-takers' "true score" probably lies.
There are many other possible causes of measurement error. A student can be having a bad day. Test-taking conditions often are not the same from place to place (they are not adequately "standardized"). Different versions of the same test are in fact not quite exactly the same.
Any one test can only measure a limited part of a subject area or a limited range of important human abilities. A "reading" test may measure only some particular reading "skills," not a full range of the ability to understand and use texts. Multiple-choice math tests can measure skill in computation or solving routine problems, but they are not good for assessing whether students can reason mathematically and apply their knowledge to new, real-world problems.
Most NRTs focus too heavily on memorization and routine procedures. Multiple-choice and short-answer questions do not measure most knowledge that students need to do well in college, qualify for good jobs, or be active and informed citizens. Tests like these cannot show whether a student can write a research paper, use history to help understand current events, understand the impact of science on society, or debate important issues. They don't test problem-solving, decision-making, judgment, or social skills.
Tests often cause teachers to overemphasize memorization and de-emphasize thinking and application of knowledge. Since the tests are very limited, teaching to them narrows instruction and weakens curriculum. Making test score gains the definition of "improvement" often guarantees that schooling becomes test coaching. As a result, students are deprived of the quality education they deserve.
Norm-referenced tests also can lower academic expectations. NRTs support the idea that learning or intelligence fits a bell curve. If educators believe it, they are more likely to have low expectations of students who score below average."
References:
Suskie, L. (2003). What is “Good” Assessment. Retrieved fromhttp://faculty.ccp.edu/dept/viewpoints/f03v4n1/suskie.html
Merrell, A. (n.d.) Traditional Assessment. Retrieved from
http://audreymerrell.net/INTASC/INTASC8/Assessment/traditionalassessment_files/traditional.html
Fairtest. The National Center for Fair and Open Testing (2007). Retrieved from http://www.fairtest.org/facts/nratests.html
Guilty as Charged
Teaching to the test refers to giving instruction to students of the contents of the standard tests that they shall take in a given time. Nothing is wrong in this definition. The problem lies when the teachers or instructors give the exact items or similar to it during class discussion or review. Some academicians assert that this kind of tactic is wrong because it is tantamount to cheating. Popham (2001) argues that item testing is unacceptable because it takes away valid inferences about the outcome of the assessment because the result assumes that the students also understand the other contents of the curriculum not just the items appearing on the test.
Veteran educator Jeanne Clements (2013) argues in favor of teaching to the test and recommends its wide use. However, she is not talking about reviewing the exact items on the standardized test but on the specific contents of the test. She stresses that the test does not rely on rote memorization of facts and concepts. She further asserts that no one condemn licensure examinations for professionals when the reviewers also result to teaching to the test.
As a student at Tapinac Elementary School in Olongapo City, I had never experienced that my teachers were actually using the outmost form of teaching to the test, which we can also refer to as “cheating to the test.” We can all infer that my teachers knew before hand the contents or subject matters of the standard or achievement tests to be given at designated time that they needed to teach us students. However, they never drill us on the actual test items or “clones” of them. They just presented us with the format and the directions of the actual test to familiarize ourselves to save time. Since we knew before hand that the result of the test will not become part of our final grade (which we never knew if ever true), test anxiety was diminished.
Nowadays, teachers’ performance are also gauged against the results of their students’ evaluation. As a result, they result to “cheating to the test” or during performance evaluation conducted by principals and other district supervisors. One of the tactics employ during visits of high ranking school officials and achievement tests is to tell low-performing pupils not to come to class during the date of the visit or test. A drill before the visit is perfected by simulating the visit’s scenario through giving high achievers their roles, that is, who will answer first, who will ask question and what, etc. This results to high satisfactory rating to students, teachers and schools.
To overcome their shortcomings as administrators, principals and teachers, there are many instances that sample or the actual test papers are being reviewed by the students and teachers. Because no one from the students up to high ranking officials of the district want to get a failing or unsatisfactory rating or remark from those above them, the performance maybe conceived as cooperative. This kind of drama becomes unacceptable when the learners do not gain from the experience. As long as the students understand the materials being presented and taken during class and these items are not the actual items, teaching to the actual test items is not wrong. This is also what is happening during review classes for the professional accreditation and certification. Teaching to the test is reprehensible if the test items being reviewed are the actual and same items or their clones.
As some teachers are guilty to some form of teaching to the test, as a student, I am also occasionally guilty to “learning to the test.” This is especially true when the teacher provides you with so many reading materials and that you do not have enough time to read them all. As a result, I tend to read and study only those that answer the study guide questions and the learning objectives. This becomes challenging because I also write what I read to fully understand them. I believe that this strategy is not at all faulty since I cover the essential knowledge and skills that need to be learned. This is different from high school where you are assigned one particular textbook to study. However, I do hope that a compressed and comprehensive reading materials is provided that tackle the essential elements of the module without sacrificing content and higher order skills, if time is limited to comprehend various materials and media.
Images from
1) http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Education/Pix/cartoons/2012/10/12/1350042607200/Ros-Asquith-Lines-cartoon-001.jpg
2) https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj52DQ3SCyNi2790LSQSabHOqI6IGPM13uKTA0gvS58Pp3rBo8reMV2L4G-OunM9hBz_yHBP8escNW_sz0dFSvixAKTYolUSwjiNKnI-sbj611BZvZZIs2Skw1ogmmSYhtivXl_yIM3yM21/s1600/david-sipress-prospective-teacher-being-interviewed-by-principal-is-given-impossible-to-cartoon.jpg
3) http://seattleducation2010.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/testing1.jpg
4) https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUtXYFDpRCXiOqkQtsxIz83YljcIxcRW-jFVj98lfDb_03byLsqgbm5VmLD8ztquKZ84XaKj6MxKQZcorn-7ZnH6dyxjhumBArGvpTFTbAEf28PYAJRFA0VOa-Il6BJ3Ki0OEN8zNaQFI/s640/1b2.jpg
5) https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVsfoztllNHOFjX6sKT2Eg0WoX3u45BHAaKXWv0mZF9KiYGqVKVQgXl1mOu8_O9vREkWdgnY-PYTZNWnwcScufO1zIXdBKyir_6S9kDQq94eSk_4_0DV0RilqHeHmKIvYNkwIjuG9XAwUe/s1600/multiple+choice+cartoon.png
6) https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgASvgC4_WgHfSDyNqAckGWDKPgJ79PWp7OMmzyhqN1awk01pYV5DffPYY_n9o6V-uYkVKTZ3Z0uubBhVbe7SrerN7UrDE3ha9NmrZSn5h0rMrNvvgrfMPnBi6jC1qqJRnJ6hzm90X1m-I/s1600/Learning+to+Take+Tests+Sign.jpg
References
Clements, J. (2013). Common Core: Veteran Educator Urges Teachers To ‘Teach To The Test’. In CP Opinion. Retrieved from http://www.christianpost.com/news/common-core-veteran-educator-urges-teachers-to-teach-to-the-test-100938/
Popham, W.J. (2001). Teaching to the Test? Helping All Students Achieve. 58 (6), 16-20. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar01/vol58/num06/Teaching-to-the-Test%C2%A2.aspx
2)
RJ De Vera Wins Mr Man Hot Star International 2023
The Philippines' RJ De Vera won Mr. Man Hot Star International 2023 held at the Saensuk Grandhall of the Bangsaen Heritage Hotel in Chon...
-
Members of the Alphi Phi Omega (APO) fraternity of UP Manila and Diliman held their traditional Oblation Run this December 2011. UP Manila ...
-
Ang edukasyon ay isang prosesong nagpapadali ng pagkatuto o ang pagkakaroon ng kaalaman, kasanayan, at magandang pag-uugali. Sa depinisyong ...
-
Kumpirmado na may jowa o boyfriend nga ang sikat na nanay nina Mark at Maycee matapos mapanood ang huling bidyo ni Kuya Val Santos Matubang ...